A Jesus Way: I Can’t Do This On My Own

Posted by Chris on Mar 22, 2010 in Church, Life |

The answer is: No.

We don’t need the Church.

Not if it’s  a religious institution that relies on politics and armies to enforce it’s rule.  Not if it’s full of legalistic hypocrites.  Not if  it’s a Civil Rights group too focused on societal ills to address personal morality.

If that’s the church, count me out.

But here’s the thing: despite my American individualistic upbringing and anti-institution punk rockness, I can’t get away from the reality that I can’t do this on my own.

However, in reading the words of Jesus, and the responses of those who knew him best, I can’t avoid two interpersonal truths.

1.  Being like Jesus is only seen in how I treat other people.  Jesus said that we should (a) love God, and (b) love people.  In other words, the best, clearest way to love God is to love people.  Therefore, in trying to follow a Jesus way, I’m going to have pour my life into others.

2.  Pouring yourself into others tears down interpersonal boundaries. When Jesus’ s friends and followers gathered together on Pentecost, crazy things started happening.  Through the power of the Holy Spirit, linguistic barriers were suddenly erased.  Then they started sharing all their stuff.  Then they started eating with people of different races and classes.  For the people that knew him best, following Jesus meant opening your home, your possessions and your daily life to others.

I have experienced community like this a few times in my life.  There have been people that opened their homes to me.  People that I spent time with every day of the week, whether or not I was fun to be around.  Meals eaten in the homes of families from another race. People who, unbidden, have given me cash so I could pay a bill.

There is no good reason to do this, to care about someone outside your clan, or give away your hard earned cash.  But it’s what Jesus did.

What I do know is I can’t do it on my own.  If this is what Church is, count me in.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Digg

Related Posts:

Tags:

  • Samjones

    A friend of mine has me listening to an audio version of So You Don’t Want to Go to Church Anymore. You might find it pretty interesting, if you haven’t checked it out already.

    Just friday I was listening to Mark Driscoll talk about how a movement becomes an organization to get things done, then becomes an institution with staff and real-estate and eventually loses sight of it’s original goals, and the goal becomes the sustenance of the institution. At that point, the game is over and it’s a matter of time before the institution becomes a museum. There’s a curator there who reminisces about the glory days, but they, “haven’t seen the Holy Spirit since the Nixon administration.”

    I’m not sure who your target audience is, but I think we have to make a clear distinction in this kind of discussion between the institutions and the actual body. It get’s muddied enough in real life, without confusing the issue on paper.

    That said, I think groups of people form organizations that become institutions with good goals in mind, most of the time. The dangers of institutions I think are plain to us, but I don’t think the bare fact of the institution is the problem. The problem is people don’t understand the Gospel. Whether you have a church full of two-faced hypocrites (legalistic), or a scattering of self-made ‘spirituals’ (license), they need to hear the Gospel. Though I think we’ll agree the fact that folks can remain members of a “Church” institution for years and never hear enough of the Gospel to repent of legalism and hypocrisy is the greater tragedy, and the greater hindrance to the cause of Christ.

    I think a good question is, are Churches as institutions always enough of a hindrance to never be the way to do things? If so, what else do we intentionally pursue?

  • http://chrismorton.info Chris

    Good questions. My only point in all of this is to counter any weight I’ve created in previous posts that might lead people to assume that following a Jesus Way might be something you can do alone. You can’t. Therefore you get Church.

    Although this is not a treatise on the Church, a serious discussion of what the Church is must be grounded in what Jesus was focused on: how to live in the Kingdom of God.

    Can radical new movements do this? Sometimes. Can institutions do this? Sometimes.

    In McLaren’s “Finding Our Way Again,” he has this incredible illustration, showing how God was at work in those who sided with Galileo that the earth revolved around the sun. They stood up for truth. But in time, the establish churches repented, and came to accept the science. So, God was at work in both, moving them, in time. When I’m frustrated with my institutional or radical brothers, I try to remember that.

  • Samjones

    I’d be interested to know who the ‘radical’ and ‘institutional’ folks are, though that’s probably not a conversation for this forum.

    Seems like I’m hearing about McLaren everywhere just now. I’ll accept McLaren’s illustration is a good one for this discussion, if we assume that it’s a discussion about church forms and practices, and also assume that the Church God is working in is still those with a faith rooted in the Gospel of Christ. I’m increasingly afraid that McLaren means a great deal more than that. Even so, it’s comforting to remember that God is in control.

Copyright © 2012 Chris Morton All rights reserved. Theme by Laptop Geek.