For hundreds of years, common wisdom assumed that the countries of the West were Christian nations.

This concept began when Constantine declared Christianity the official religion of his empire. It was reinforced with the advent of Protestant National churches. Then, beginning with John Winthrop’s famous “City on a Hill” sermon in 1630, civic religion and cultural Christianity became intertwined in the institutions of the United States.

The result was that Westerners were generally considered “Christian”. Individuals often had a normative level of Biblical literacy. Institutions, government, and leaders were assumed to espouse “Christian values”. In this “Christendom” system, conversion often meant claiming membership in a specific denomination and church attendance. Politicians were expected to attend Church and govern in “Christian” ways. There was little discernible difference between being a good citizen and a follower of Christ.

For decades now, these institutional structures have been breaking down. Most countries in Europe are predominantly secular and often skeptical of religion. The U.S. does not seem to be far behind. Stuart Murray defines this “post-Christendom” as:

the culture that emerges as the Christian faith loses coherence within a society that has been definitively shaped by the Christian story and as the institutions that have been developed to express Christian convictions decline in influence (Stuart Murray, The Naked Anabaptist, 78).

This means that forms of churches that might have thrived under Christendom are either showing diminishing returns or have failed altogether.

Followers of Christ in the west now have the opportunity to define themselves apart from the expectations of their culture. Conversations are thriving around the word “missional,” as churches and Christian organizations seek to understand what it means to be missionaries in this new post-Christendom context.

Remember the Radicals?

The church can find guidance for this new season in many places, such as the thriving missionary church in China, dissenting historical movements like the early Franciscans, and most obviously, the early church. Within the Western church, one particular example is equipped for the challenges of this new reality: The Anabaptist tradition.

Anabaptism arose from the same cultural stew that birthed the Protestant reformation. Luther, Calvin and Zwingli spoke out against the abuses of the Catholic Church, yet they were quick to partner up with the burgeoning kingdoms of Europe. A few of these reformers went beyond reform in search of a more basic approach to Christian community.

These radical reformers taught that the choice to follow Christ should be made freely by consenting believers.

In both Catholic and Protestant nations, where church and state were intertwined, infant baptism was both a religious and a nationalist ritual. The term “anabaptism” was used to derogatorially label those who chose to be “re-baptized” as adults. In a world where their was little separation between church and state, the act was seen as both treasonist as heretical.

From their beginning, the Anabaptist movement has been an attempt to follow Jesus in spite of the surrounding cutlure and its civic religion.

Both the history and the formal groups that can be traced back to Anabaptism demonstrate that the tradition is far from perfect. However, with its genesis as a reaction to Christendom, it seems to be uniquely equipped for life in the increasingly Post-Christendom West.

The present-day Western Church needs to look to the Anabaptist tradition for clear approach to conversion, politics and its way of life. 

Conversion

In Post-Christendom, the church will need a robust definition of conversion.

In a culture where Christianity is assumed, practices like infant baptism and re-commitment are natural. These sacramental acts serve to support the cultural norms. However, in a missionary situation, following Christ means identifying with a way of life that is radically different from the surrounding culture.

The Anabaptist tradition, with its strong emphasis on the believer’s baptism and a uniquely Christian community life, provides a powerful framework for understanding conversion.

Anabaptists are best known or perhaps most notorious, for their emphasis on believer’s baptism. The movement’s origin stories cite stories of brave founders baptizing each other, and subsequently entire churches and cities. Menno Simmons taught that baptism was at the center of the conversion experience.

Those who believe receive remission of sins, not by, but in baptism.

They receive the good news of grace, of the remission of sins, of peace, of favour, of mercy and eternal life through Christ.

Believing this they get new minds. They deny themselves. They sincerely repent of their past life. They study the Bible diligently and obey the Gospel’s command. They trust in the merits of the blood of Christ.

Then they receive the sign of obedience, water baptism, as proof before God and his commune that they firmly believe in the remission of sins through Jesus Christ as it was preached and taught to them from the Word of God. When all this takes place, they receive remission of their sins in baptism. They receive it according to the promise of grace (The Secret of the Strength).

Ambrosius Spittelmayr described baptism as a man’s commitment to

throw himself under God and stay faithful to him in spite of prison, the sword, or whatever trial may come. . . It is to suffer with him. It is to be baptized like him, in blood” (ibid).

Baptism was both alluring and threatening because it was simultaneously something both ancient and new. It is the oldest practice or the church, beginning at Pentecost. In the context of 16th century Christendom, it was an act of both heresy and treason.

Is it possible for conversion to be as alienating and alluring today as it was then?

The challenge of the missionary in post-Christendom is two-fold. On one hand, many in the culture have no awareness of the way of Christ. On the other hand, the prevailing culture remains full of memories Christendom-era institutions.

The strength of this Anabaptist approach to conversion is in its recognition that choosing to follow Christ is a dangerous act of insurrection. In the secular West, the act of baptism itself may no longer be a threat to the empire, but choosing to follow Jesus remains full of countercultural, revolutionary acts.

Perhaps what is missing from the Church’s testimony in post-Christendom is to accept the way of Christ, and to follow him in ways that the surrounding culture will not understand.

Anabaptism also provides a theological tradition that illuminates what the convert is to become. Menno Simons summarized what many early Anabaptists thought about the similarity of baptism and circumcision.

Outward baptism with water is a seal or proof of our faith, just as outward circumcision was to the believing and obedient Abraham” (ibid).

As circumcision separated Abraham and his children as a new ethnicity, so baptism acts as an entrance into a new community.

Over the centuries,  Anabaptists have developed a multifaceted theology of community. Some have focused on the economic ramifications of Christian community.

One early group, the Hutterites, inspired by the Jerusalem church in Acts 2, continue to practice a common-purse model today. For others, the focus is on egalitarianism. Michael Gaismair likens the new Christian community to a land in which the walls have been broken down, and there are

no more cities but only villages. Then there will be no distinctions among men, and no one shall consider himself more important or better than anyone else” (ibid).

Baptism then acts an entrance into what John Howard Yoder calls “the new humanity.” Drawing on 2 Corinthians 5 and Galatians 3, anabaptis theologian John Howard Yoder describes how

Baptism celebrates and effects the merging of the Jewish and the Gentile stories. They become a people with the law and a people without, a people walled off from the world and a people open to it, become a single community, melding the legacies of both…This new status is a new kind of social relationship, a unity that overarches the differences (Jew/ Gentile, male/ female, slave/ free) that previously had separated people (Yoder, The Body Politic).

Since everyone in Christendom is a Christian, churches have no need of demonstrating a unique way of being human or living in community. Instead of confusing the two, the Anabaptist tradition describes

Church and world are not two compartments under separate legislation or two institutions with contradictory assignments, but two levels of the pertinence of the same Lordship. The people of God is called to be today what the world is called to be ultimately.

The 21st century Western Post-Christendom world is full of inequities. The attempted movements like “Occupy Wall Street”, Marriage Equality and the digital terrorism of the group Anonymous reveal a deep cultural dissatisfaction with inequity. Sadly, the church is often cited as being more of a hindrance than a help with these issues.

While the Church will not completely embrace a culture’s understanding of egalitarianism, it cannot deny the scriptural all to value individuals for being made in the image of God, and all members of the body of Christ for their unique contribution. In its approach to conversion, the Anabaptist tradition offers theology and examples of how such ideals can be lived out that answer the question of the age.

Politics

Few issues facing the Post-Christendom Church are more treacherous than politics.  From Constantine to George W. Bush, politics have been a defining element of the Church in the West. In Europe, political systems have used religion to justify the Crusades, the Protestant Wars following the Reformation, the Nazi Party, and the IRA. In the U.S., politics have become Christian’s most recognizable trait.

According to Lyons and Kinnaman

One-fifth of all American adults (21 percent) believe ‘the political efforts of conservative Christians’ are a major problem facing the country today… More than 110 million adult Americans admit they maintain misgivings about the role of ‘conservative Christians.’ (Kinnaman and Lyons, unChristian: What a New Generation Really Thinks about Christianity…and Why It Matters.) 

Any presentation of the way of Jesus in the West must compete with this common conception of Christianity as a dangerous political movement.

Modern democracies of the West are different from the empires the early Anabaptists revolted against, but they still have many of the same flaws. Most obvious among these being war.

The Anabaptist witness itself is mixed on this topic. Their responses range from groups like the Amish have disavowed politics along with the rest of society, to others who seem indistinguishable from the larger Christian sub-culture.

But politics cannot avoided. Politics happen when people need to become organized. Anabaptist thought is most useful, not in defining how to interact with systems of the State, but in recapturing what politics truly is. The word politics derives from polis, often translated a city.  “It means the orderly way in which they live together and make decisions, the way they structure their common life”. By this definition, the Church itself is a polis, and it “cannot do otherwise than exercise these same functions, going about its business as a body” (Yoder).

For centuries,  the church has been preoccupied with how to manage the affairs of State in a “Christian” manner. In the U.S., this has led some Churches to focus on what they deem “moral” issues, and other churches to focus on “justice” issues. Neo-Anabaptist authors Fitch and Holsclaw criticize this approach, observing that while

they may differ on their version of what a Christian America should look like, they are both using the same tactic to work for God’s justice in the world.

[The problem with this approach is that] they turn the church into a recruitment center for individuals to go out and seek a justice in the world that is more conceptual than real. And the church itself, the social embodiment of the Lordship of Christ on earth, is never considered as an entity that lives God’s justice and reconciliation before the world and in the world. (Fitch & Holsclaw, Prodigal Christianity: 10 Signposts into the Missional Frontier.)

This image of the Church as counter-society seems to be far from the reality that non-Christians have witnessed in the United States.

According Lyons’ and Kinnaman’s data “Eighty-five percent of young outsiders have had sufficient exposure to Christians and churches that they conclude present-day Christianity is hypocritical” (Kinnaman 2007: 4). By hypocritical, they mean that Christians may have standards they try to hold others to which they seldom hold to themselves. This leads to an inability to differentiate between those who follow Christ and those who do not. “Among young outsiders, 84 percent say they personally know at least one committed Christian. Yet just 15 percent thought the lifestyles of those Christ followers were significantly different from the norm. This gap (15 to 84 percent) speaks volumes.”

The Christendom Church’s inability to present itself as counter-society is directly related to it’s political approach.

In Christendom, the Church the tools of the State should be used to enforce Christian ideals on the broader world. It should be no surprise that the result of this approach is a perception of hypocrisy.

Hypocrisy is not a Christian problem; it’s a human problem. The Christian response to all sin, including hypocrisy, is a combination of discipleship (that is working towards being less hypocritical) and grace, (an understanding that the Christian will never be fully discipled. In the relationship based context of the local church, this nuanced approach can be navigated. However, the public political public stage, does not organize itself around discipleship and grace. The inevitable result is that Christendom political groups highlight their own hypocrisy.

This Anabaptist approach would say that whether or not there is good to be done by managing the affairs of State, it is the Church’s job is to be a unique counterculture. Neo-Anabaptist theologian Stanley Hauerwas encourages the church to eschew using political systems to pursue a social agenda because

the most creative social strategy we have to offer is the church. Here, we show the world a manner of life the world can never achieve through social coercion or governmental action. We serve the world by showing it something that it is not, namely, a place where God is forming a family out of strangers (Hauerwas and Willimon, Resident Aliens: Life in the Christian Colony).

While Post-Christendom remains in a misunderstanding of Christians as a hypocritical national political block, the Anabaptist tradition claims that the Church can simply be the Church. Without the responsibility of managing the affairs of State, the Church can turn it’s focus towards embodying and demonstrating the best that humanity can be: that is, a new humanity, formed by the persons and teachings of Jesus Christ.

It is fair to mention that it is on this exact point that the Anabaptist tradition has its most obvious shortcoming.  If anything is known about Anabaptists by the larger American pop-culture, it is the image of the Pennsylvania Amish, plain dressed and driving horse and buggy. From the Schleigtheim Confession forward, many Anabaptists have taken the call of being countercultural as permission to be  separatist. British Neo-Anabaptist leader Stuart Murray responds to this by pointing out that Schleightheim and other

statements need to be read in context. Persecuted communities often have little option but separation if they hope to survive. If the state is trying to eradicate you, if other churches brand you as “heretics” and neighbors are expected to denounce and betray you to the authorities, what else can you do? (Murray, The Naked Anabaptist).

Murray sees separatism as an aberration of the original vision of the movement. He points out that early Anabaptists were committed to social reform and church planting. He also points out the ways that his British Anabaptist Network is engaged in culture. To his list could be added the Mennonite Central Committee relief agency and neo-Anabaptist churches with a strong focus on evangelism. Murray admits that separatism, has no place in the post-Christendom church. However, he is hesitant to dismiss it altogether.

Perhaps separatism should not be dropped entirely, …The Old and New Testaments both call for the people of God to be distinctive, nonconformist, and separate. …As the Christendom era comes to an end and we rediscover our biblical status as “resident aliens,” maybe the Anabaptist tradition can help us discern when principled withdrawal is more appropriate than collusion, how to assess the benefits and drawbacks of participation, and whether there might sometimes be less conventional ways of being involved (ibid).

As the Church transitions into post-Christendom, politics, as well as the ghosts of past political stances, will continue to be a monumental issue. Both the strengths and weaknesses of Anabaptist theology and history provide the post-Christendom church with tools for embracing the political situations of this new era.

Way of Life

The challenge of Post-Christendom can be summarized as a general sense of confusion over what the Church should be. Formed as a rejection of Christendom, the Anabaptist tradition is particularly equipped to respond. Stuart Murray’s emerging Anabaptist movement in Britain begins their statement of seven core convictions by saying that

Jesus is our example, teacher, friend, redeemer, and Lord. He is the source of our life, the central reference point for our faith and lifestyle, for our understanding of church, and our engagement with society. We are committed to following Jesus as well as worshipping him. (Murray).

As obvious as “Christians follow Jesus example” may sound, Murray points out just how countercultural this was in the Reformation era and remains today.

He argues that focus on worshipping Jesus as a divine being has marginalized the person and teachings of Jesus. Catholics envisioned Jesus as a far off imperial figure. Luther himself appears to favor Paul over the gospels, when he states “it would be better to lack the works and the history than the words and the doctrine.” (ibid: 55). Such an approach to Christianity allows one to “worship” Jesus while avoiding the call to follow him. This has been used to justify the idea that one can “love the enemies into whom you were thrusting your sword.” (ibid: 54).

By focusing on Jesus as example, the question shifts from “What is the right way to worship?” to “How do I follow Jesus’s example?” This question, summed up by the word “discipleship”, is, according to Anabaptist scholar Harold S. Bender, “first and fundamental in the Anabaptist vision.” An Anabaptist discipleship assumes that

the life and teachings of Christ are to be duplicated in principle…Furthermore Christ’s message becomes the message of the disciple… His  sweeping rejection of social and political structures,

His mobility and freedom from cultural attachments, His eschatological outlook, and His love and nonresistance are accepted as normative for all believers.

The uniqueness of Anabaptism lies in its conviction that Christianity is much more than reflection upon Christ as the divine being who has invaded time, and it is more  than the appropriation of the benefits of the divine drama of the cross. Christianity is concrete and realistic “imitation” of Christ’s life and work in the context of the kingdom of God (Burkholder, The Recovery of the Anabaptist Vision.)

What all is entailed in an Anabaptist style of discipleship for the Post-Christendom world?

Neo-Anabaptist writers Fitch and Holsclaw draw on Karl Barth’s interpretation of Jesus as the ideal “prodigal son,” where “the journey of the Son reveals the true nature of the parable, expressing the radical missionary nature of God, that the Father has sent the Son into the far country to redeem the world. The disciples are sent out with the promise “God is with us,” and they act as “an extension of the incarnation, as the extension of the life and ministry of Jesus” (Fitch and Holsclaw, Prodigal).

They suggest seven practices for the Church to enact this way of life together.

The Hospitality of the Table

In instituting the Lord’s Supper, Jesus is creating a practice of humility, egalitarianism and hospitality. The act of serving and eating with people who are different brings the eschatological reality of the kingdom into the present moment, and it spills into other opportunities for service throughout the week.

Proclamation of the Gospel

Proclamation is the act of declaring a reality (or truth) that others have yet to see (the kingdom has come!) and doing so in a way that speaks into a situation (“every town and place”; Luke 10:1 NIV)”. They give the example of responding to others by reminding them “Jesus is Lord of your situation,” or asking the question “what do you think God is asking of you?

Reconciliation

They suggest practicing the method of reconciliation provided by Jesus in Matthew 18. This extends the incarnation

because Christ has reconciled us to God, we are working out this reconciliation with one another under his reign. As we practice this reconciliation in our lives together, we are then able to practice it in the neighborhood, bringing Christ’s in-breaking authority to broken relationships and structures where we live.

Being with People on the Fringes

Jesus says that when you are truly present with ‘the least of these,’ you are also in his presence and this is a sign of what the kingdom looks like (Matthew 25: 31– 46). This means creating opportunities to connect with different types of people often across racial or economic lines, where] we relax, take all agendas off the table, listen, and pay attention in order to listen for God and discover where God is working.

Being with the Children

[Jesus taught]  when we welcome children, when we are present with them in love and hospitality, Jesus becomes present with us… Only by welcoming and becoming like children can we enter the kingdom of God (18: 3)…When we refuse to make children into a separate program or ministry… We find ourselves being transformed by the love of children and the things they teach us.”

Fivefold Ministry and Gifts

Jesus is not distant, but instead is present through his offer of “gifts for equipping the church: apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers….these gifts are not only for the internal organization of the church…rather, they are necessary for forming the kingdom in each neighborhood.

Kingdom Prayer

Following the model of the Lord’s prayer, Jesus teaches that Kingdom Prayer is

first and foremost about submitting our lives, circumstances, needs, wants, and struggles into God’s coming kingdom…” Such prayer creates space for Christ power and healing, removes ego and interacts with tangible issues in one’s life and community.

The Post-Christendom West is full of people who have encountered churches, Christians and Christian Institutions, but may not have encountered Jesus or any who are following his example. The Anabaptist tradition fills this gaping hole by providing a rich history of individuals and communities that testify to what this way of life could be.

Rescuing the Church from Christendom

In the Spring of 2013 a gathering of missional thinkers and practitioners convened in Washington D.C. for the inaugural Missio Alliance gathering. Among the topics that seemed to recur was the idea that following Christ must be embodied presently and in eternity.

Anglican leader Tony Bauccum noted that the questions that the world is asking today are “creational” questions, that is “what does it mean to be human?” New Testament scholar Cherith Fee Nordling described the church as a “movie preview” of the kingdom of God. Church planter Keas Keasler focused on the call of the church to live non-violently. Mennonite preacher Bruxy Cavey explained their church’s focus on being Christlike as opposed to being religious. There seemed to be a common desire to move beyond teaching what to believe and articulate a Jesus-like way of life.

Missio Alliance displayed a trend that is happening across denominations. Churches in the West, often built on the cultural Christianity of Christendom, seem to be asking the question: “What would it look like for us to follow Christ?”

The answer will be new, because it will have to respond to the cultural realities of the 21st century. If they succeed, it will be because they have created a third way that refuses collude with either the forces of secularism, paganism, or Christendom.

When Peter confessed that Jesus was the Messiah, Jesus responded by telling him “on this rock I shall build my Church.” His choice of the word ekklēsia for his Church is telling. It was a political word, used to describe citizens who had been called out of their larger community, and assembled for the purposes of deliberation.

The work of the Church in the Post-Christendom West will be to recapture this sense of being a called out people, deliberating together on how to live in the world. The result will be a movement of dissidents, carving out a new way of life together in the ruins of the old Church and the shadow of the secular and pagan world order.

The good news is that they will only be the latest in a long lineage of dissidents. Looming in history are the Anabaptists, as well as Jesuits, Franciscans, Waldensians, Moravians and untold others. Chief among them all is the King who revolted against the Empire of Rome and the religion of his people, Jesus Christ.

Bibliography

Burkholder, J. Lawrence. The Anabaptist Vision of Disicpleship. The Recovery of the Anabaptist Vision. Edited by Guy F. Hershberger. Waterloo, Ontario: Herald Press, 1957.

Fitch, David, and Geoff Holsclaw. Prodigal Christianity: 10 Signposts into the Missional Frontier. San Francisco, Ca: Jossey-Bass, 2013.

Hoover, Peter. Scroll Publishing, “The Secret of the Strength: What Would the Anabaptists Tell This Generation?.” Accessed June 12, 2013. http://www.gw.org/Sos/.

Lyons, Gabe, and David Kinnaman. unChristian: What a New Generation Really Thinks about Christianity…and Why It Matters. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2007.

Murray, Stuart. The Naked Anabaptist: The Bare Essentials of a Radical Faith. Waterloo, Ontartio: Herald Press, 2010.

Various Speakers. “The Future of the Gospel: Renewing Evangelical Imagination for Mission.” Lectures at the Missio Alliance Inaugural Gathering, April 10-13, 2013.

Willimon, William, and Stanley Hauerwas. Resident Aliens: Life in the Christian Colony. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1989.

Winthrop, John. University of Virginia Library, “A Model of Christian Charity .” Accessed June 12, 2013. http://religiousfreedom.lib.virginia.edu/sacred/charity.html.

Yoder, John Howard. Body Politics: Five Practices of the Christian Community Before the Watching World. Waterloo, Ontario: Herald Press, 1992.

The post How Anabaptism Could Be the Solution to a Lot of Problems appeared first on Chris Morton.

300,000 people from around the world have descended on a few miles of my home city for the sprawling series of parties, conferences and concerts known as South by Southwest. For two weeks, our once sleepy hippy town hosts the elite of software, film and, of course, music.

Careers are made or destroyed. Bands set up in alleys. Beer flows like water. A torrential downpour of water. It is the kind of place to see and be seen.

Which begs the question, is there room for Jesus at SXSW?

Why I Ended Up in Austin

The primary reason I moved to Austin in 2006 is because I thought it was cool. For decades, it had been a music lover’s paradise, a hippy refuge and it was just then becoming a force in culture and technology.

But I had also been convinced it was where God wanted people like me.

In college, I had become enraptured with the idea that American Christians had to start thinking of themselves as missionaries. This led me to Church Planting, which is still my vocation today.

That was the same time when evangelicals were rediscovering that the Bible had something to say about the poor. This was part of a larger rumbling that they had lost the culture wars, and there was a need for a sort of evangelical rebranding. A TED knock off event was organized to talk about it. It seemed to be important, so I found a way in.

Of all the big ideas at the event that got to me was the concept that the Church should work for the common good. One speaker, an Australian that is now a missionary to New York, described his passion for the city as a burden to do “cultural acupuncture,” dropping missionaries most influential neighborhoods around the world.

It sounded exciting. It sounded like a strategy that could transform the world. Who wouldn’t want to be a part of that?

Transformers (Christians in Disguise?)

In the time since that then, the idea of the Church working for the Common Good has become common place in all kinds of churches. The teachings of Abraham Kuyper and Francis Schaeffer can be heard echoing throughout the halls of Pastors conferences, seminaries and elders meetings around the country.

Kuyper is the brilliant 19th century Calvinist famous for saying

“There is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry, Mine!”

His intellectual descendants want to see Christian ideals transform politics, art and the social sector.

Schaeffer continues to be a source of inspiration. He is recognized as the catalyst behind Christian political activism. These days, he is known just as much for his thoughts on “Art and the Bible”

“A Christian should use these arts to the glory of God, not just as tracts, mind you, but as things of beauty to the praise of God.”

These ideas have found their greatest advocate in one of the most winsome and articulate Christian thinkers of our time, Tim Keller. His book, Center Church, is a combination instruction manual and text book on creating a Kuyperian-style church that can transform a city.

And who wants to disagree with Tim Keller?

Jesus needs new PR

Let’s face it: There are a lot of church people who are desperate for some new PR.

We’re tired of being known for what we are against. We’re tired of being called bigots or oppressive. We’re embarrassed that sometimes, those accusations ring true.

We’re tired of the scandals. We’re tired of being thought of as a political block.

We’re also tired of being cheesy. We don’t want Kurt Cameron. We want Mumford and Johnny Cash.

Behind it all, we’re tired of institutions that promote religiosity, but don’t seem to change lives or care about their city.

So we jumped on board with shoe drops, fighting slavery and cooler conferences. By working for the common good we could “do kingdom work” and hopefully, improve our reputations at the same time.

What Could Be Bad about the Common Good?

There are two problems with the Common Good that no one except Scot McKnight seems to want to talk about.

The first problem is that people who start out working for the common good in churches often find themselves at odd with those churches.

I saw this first hand at a conference hosted a few months back here in Austin around the idea of “human care.” There was a lot of talk about needs such as adoption and human trafficking. The conference was full of web savvy Christian social entrepreneurs. Each of them seemed to be sponsoring something somewhere else.

There was also a perceptible undercurrent of discontent. People were tired. Transforming the world was a lot of work. It felt like no one, including their churches, knew how to help.

The second problem is that it’s hard to find “working for the Common Good” in the Bible. Jesus talks a lot about personal repentance. He seems a lot more concerned about the lowly than the prominent. When he encounters prominent public officials, he doesn’t seem to have a lot to say.

The first century church doesn’t seem too concerned about the common good. Rather than trying to improve the city of Jerusalem, they sold everything in order to take care of each other.

In 70 AD, Jerusalem was burnt to the ground.

What SXSW Showcase Would Jesus Go To?

As a Church, we have always had our own calendar. Being missionaries today must include rethinking our calendar to communicate the story of Jesus in our time and place.

So, there’s a part of me that wants to see Jesus all over SXSW. But I’m not convinced that it’s his kind of party. Here’s four reasons why:

1. Jesus was rested.
   SXSW is a constant blur of motion. Parties run for 24 hours a day for almost two weeks. It’s loud. It’s dirty. Bad things happen because people get stressed out and exhausted.Scripture describes how Jesus would wake up early for alone time and take personal retreats. He had a pattern of rest that defined his life. It’s hard to imagine fitting that into SXSW.
2. Jesus hung out with nobodies.
   One of the reasons you go to SXSW is because Jay-Z or Chelsea Clinton might show up unannounced. We don’t know who all of Jesus friends were, but the ones we do know tended to be poor and outcast. It’s not that he hated celebs, but he definitely did not seek them out.
3. Jesus didn’t have anything to sell.
   SXSW is all about pitching. It’s two weeks of businesses and artists trying to prove themselves. Jesus had ideas to teach, but he didn’t sell them. He constantly invited people to learn and change. He didn’t make much money off it either.
4. Jesus didn’t have a lot of new ideas.
   SXSW is for world changing ideas. Most of what Jesus had to say was reworked passages from Moses and the Psalms. It’s like he was reminding people “this is what God has always been doing.”

What about Art and Slavery?

For those of us who jumped on the transformationalist bandwagon, this is a hard pill to swallow. “Are you saying we shouldn’t care about _______?”

Absolutely not.

Slavery is terrible.

Art is good.

But neither making great art nor freeing slaves is the purpose of the Church.

By “The Church” I’m going with the simple definition of “those who have responded together to Jesus call to repent and make God our king.” How do we do that? By being disciples (together) and making disciples (together.)

How then do we respond to the great need to create art or the human crises of our day?

The answer is to work towards a better understanding of calling and vocation. Some people are called to preach, others to pastor, others to be bookkeepers, app developers, musicians, filmmakers and emancipators. We must constantly ask “what is it that I love to do, and how can I do it in a way that looks like Jesus?”

So where would Jesus show up at SXSW?

Jesus would be at the downtown corner where a man drove into a crowd killing two and injuring 28.

Jesus would be a pedicabber if that was the job he had to do.

Jesus would pour the best drinks if bartending was the job he had to do.

Jesus would give a great presentation, run sound for a venue, or help film a movie, if that was the job he had to do.

The way of Jesus is to do our jobs and live our life with a full understanding and expectation that God is both our boss and our daddy.

The post There Might Not Be Enough Room for Jesus at #SXSW. appeared first on Chris Morton.

In the American church, this has led to about 30 years of confusion. Traditional denominations struggled to reach boomers, which led to the seeker churches and their wild step-children, the emergents. However, with declining institutions, our culture struggles to provide a sense of identity, and so do these new churches.

Many turned to a movement claiming heritage in the 16th century reformers. This provided black and white theology, gender roles and political stances. In a world without identity, this movement provided a name, community and instructions. It also left many of us scratching our heads. There’s nothing wrong with wanting to be a part of something bigger. Those of us who disagree must respond by working harder to articulate we believe God is calling us to be.

Increasingly, many, including myself, have been using the term “neo-anabaptist“. While I see this as a welcome alternative, there are two major problems.

1. Historically, the Anabaptists are known for withdrawing from society. I do not believe that modern-day missional thinkers can fully embrace this side of the heritage.

2. When I read others toying with this phrase, I often think “I’m not sure we mean the same thing when we say anabaptist.”

So here’s my challenge to us who are embracing this term: Let’s create a new confession.

As the early Anabaptists gathered in Schleitheim in 1527 to figure out what they had in common, we who find this approach to life together, theology and mission important, should find a way to state what we agree on.

The Schleitheim Confession addressed seven topics valid to the 16th century. Here are seven issues a 21st Century missional neo-anabaptist must to address:

The Centrality of Jesus

Who do we believe Jesus is? What does it mean to read the Bible through our understanding of Jesus? What does it mean to be a church that looks like Jesus?

The Mission of God

What is God up to in the world? Where does the church fit in to that mission?

The Believer’s Baptism

What does it mean to become a follower of Jesus? What should be the consequences of baptism? What does the church call the unbeliever to do?

A Contrast Community

What is the church? What is it’s relationship to God’s mission? How does it relate to a globalized, pluralistic world?

The Image of God

What are the consequences in believing that all are made in the image of God? How does this inform our approach to gender, race, economics, pregnancy, leadership, etc.?

A Commitment to Peace

How does the church practice peaceful relations internally? How do we model peace to outside parties with whom we disagree? Does the church have a responsibility to make peace in the broader world?

From Here to Eternity

What is the church’s role in stewarding the earth? To what extent do we embrace trends, opportunities and technology? How do we best anticipate the God’s new creation?

My hope is that others will respond to this, in blogs, conferences and their own churches. Let’s have a conversation about who God is calling us to be.

__________________________________

What do you think? Do you see a need for a new confession? What would you take away or add?

The post We really need a Neo-Anabaptist Confession appeared first on Chris Morton.

John Howard Yoder, Body Politics

The post Feminism is not enough appeared first on Chris Morton.

The Anabaptist tradition helps a lot with this, perhaps because they were formed as a rejection of 16th century Christendom. Unfortunately, much of the tradition is “separatist”, avoiding engagement with the outside. This is where the growing missional conversation is so important: it gives the church a theology and approach for loving, serving and proclaiming in a culture where they are minorities.

Authors Fitch and Holsclaw call this missional-anabaptist approach “Prodigal”. This is drawn from Karl Barth’s interpretation of Jesus as the ideal “prodigal son”, a “radical missionary… that the Father has sent the Son into the far country to redeem the world”. Their book Prodigal Christianity: 10 Signposts into the Missional Frontier suggests seven practices should shape the life of the church today.

1. The Hospitality of the Table
In instituting the Lord’s Supper, Jesus is creating a practice of humility, egalitarianism and hospitality. The act of serving and eating with people who are different brings the reality of the kingdom into the present, and spills into other opportunities for service throughout the week.

2. Proclamation of the Gospel
“Proclamation is the act of declaring a reality (or truth) that others have yet to see (the kingdom has come!)” They give the example of responding to others by reminding them “Jesus is Lord of your situation,” or asking the question “what do you think God is asking of you?”

3. Reconciliation
They suggest practicing the method of reconciliation provided by Jesus in Matthew 18. “As we practice this reconciliation in our lives together, we are then able to practice it in the neighborhood, bringing Christ’s in-breaking authority to broken relationships and structures where we live.”

4. Being with People on the Fringes
“Jesus says that when you are truly present with ‘the least of these,’ you are also in his presence and this is a sign of what the kingdom looks like (Matthew 25: 31– 46)”. This means creating opportunities to connect with different types of people often across racial or economic lines, where “we relax, take all agendas off the table, listen, and pay attention in order to listen for God and discover where God is working”.

5. Being with the Children
Jesus taught “when we welcome children, when we are present with them in love and hospitality, Jesus becomes present with us… Only by welcoming and becoming like children can we enter the kingdom of God (18:3)… When we refuse to make children into a separate program or ministry… We find ourselves being transformed by the love of children and the things they teach us.”

6. Fivefold Ministry and Gifts
Jesus is not distant but instead is present through his offer of “gifts for equipping the church: apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers….these gifts are not only for the internal organization of the church…rather, they are necessary for forming the kingdom in each neighborhood.”

7. Kingdom Prayer
Following the model of the Lord’s prayer, Jesus teaches that Kingdom Prayer is “first and foremost about submitting our lives, circumstances, needs, wants, and struggles into God’s coming kingdom…” Such prayer creates space for Christ’s power and healing, removes ego and interacts with tangible issues in one’s life and community.

What do you think of these seven practices? Do they fit the reality of your situation? What would you add?

The post 7 Practices of a “Prodigal” Church appeared first on Chris Morton.